header photo

via positiva

Thoughts on murder

Those who know me are familiar with what I like to call my storied past: I was conservative religious pro-life dude who published an ideological 'zine for a bit short of a decade, etc. Calling me an 'activist' might have been a bit of a stretch, but I did door-to-door pamphleteering, wrote rabble-rousing screeds, sent money to Focus on the Family, railed against activist judges, etc.

Over time, I've changed and my beliefs have changed. It's a complex and tangly story, with no easy summaries. Suffice to say, this week's news that Dr. George Tiller was assassinated fills me with a profound sense of sadness, regret, and some anger.

Roughly twenty years ago, I was writing editorials about the evils of abortion and the dark plans that liberals and the Mainstream Media had for the youth of America. I coordinated with the Family Research Council. I interviewed lawyers who fought the ACLU, and I sent out newsletters urging readers to donate to the cause. In high school, my friends and I wanted to protest at an abortion clinic, but our parents put a kibosh on it for fear that the media would attack the Christian group we were a part of. The spirit was willing, one might say, but the flesh was weak.

Tiller the Killer

During those years, Dr. George Tiller occupied a special place in the pro-life ecosystem. As one of the last remaining physicians trained and willing to perform late-term abortions, he was Hitler. I don't mean that in a snarky, ironic post-Godwin sort of way, either. Tiller was, in the lexicon of the movement, an unrepentant mass murder for profit. A man so morally debased, so profoundly selfish and brutal, that nothing could stop him from abusing young women, killing their children with his own hands, and taking their money. Literally.

When discussions of "compromise" or "common ground" came up (and occasionally they did), Tiller occupied the easy-to-dismiss 'evil' role. Again, like Hitler, he was the figure that you could immediately use to define the extreme before returning to the real discussion.

Operation Rescue at that time was a bright light, an organization willing to take risks in a fight that we felt was no different than the abolitionist movement. Passive resistance, protests, blockading, picketing of clinic workers' houses... While some of the tactics might have caused a twinge of discomfort, it had to be put in perspective. Millions of murders a year were legal. Were we afraid someone's feelings would be hurt?

Sure, some people said that there were attempts at bombing abortion clinics. But that was mostly the stuff of urban legend. And in No True Scotsman fashion, we knew that anyone who would do that wasn't a real pro-lifer. Except... Well, couldn't it be justified, if you thought about it? It was a hard question, after all. Saving hundreds of innocents by blowing up a building...? Perhaps...?

No. No, of course not. Innocent bystanders could be hurt. Bombings were unacceptable. And most of them were probably pro-abortion people, trying to make pro-lifers look bad.

But the question hung in the air for those of us immersed in the movement: if we believed that abortion was murder, and we believed that Tiller was, literally, like Hitler, why were we afraid to take the next logical step? In 1993, when a woman shot Tiller twice outside his clinic, the question boiled over again.

Sea change

By that time I was grappling with uncomfortable questions about my own beliefs, and the implications of my own faith-related questions. The attack on Tiller was a bad thing, obviously, but my biggest concern was that it would make it harder to convince people of the moral superiority of the pro-life cause.

Tiller was evil, obviously, but we had to be better than him.

As the years rolled on, I grew more troubled by the 'Movement' and began to drift out of it. While I'd never been a protester and I'd never carried a sign, I had certainly been vocal about my views in print and in person. I grew quieter and kept the complexities of my feelings on the issue to myself--in part because I was no longer quite sure what I believed about the issue.

Dr. George Tiller, however, remained a monster frozen in amber to me: an archetype, not a real person. I knew, peripherally, that Operation Rescue and other pro-life groups continually protested his clinic, stalked his employees, followed them to grocery stores and chanted slogans. Years-long legal fights were started to close his clinic down. In one instance a nurse at his clinic had to quit after activists discovered her husband's place of work and began protesting there. I remember hearing that Tiller kept his home's location a secret, that he drove an armored car and had to maintain a security service. It made sense: Tiller's name was always on the 'hit lists' of 'baby butchers,' and the movement, as it aged, worked hard to keep it there.

Then and now

Years have passed, even since the days of my fuzzy confusion. I look back on my association with the pro-life movement with deep regret; the good is accomplished by the "help women in trouble" faction must be weighed, honestly, against the rhetoric of the activist side of that ideological family. Indeed, the unwillingness to condemn that activist branch is the ongoing shame of the less-radical pro-life contingent.

Last night, I heard that Dr. Tiller had finally been killed. He was shot to death as he handed out church announcements in his own congregation.

Church?

I had never realized he went to church.

For that matter, I never knew much about him at all.

The man who shot him was a pro-life protester, apparently active enough in Kansas pro life circles that others knew of him and had encountered him. He'd been arrested in 1996 for possession of a bomb, and he'd recently posted on the Operation Rescue web site praying that someone would "bring justice" to Tiller. He suggested that activists visit Tiller's church.

According to the Wichita Eagle article about the killing, "Those who know Roeder said he believed that killing abortion doctors was an act of justifiable homicide." Randall Terry, the founder of Operation Rescue, spoke at a press conference today. His statement?

"The point that must be emphasized over, and over, and over again: pro-life leaders and the pro-life movement are not responsible for George Tiller's death. George Tiller was a mass-murderer and, horrifically, he reaped what he sowed....

"Thank you for coming, unless there's any other questions. And I truly am sorry that we had to meet under these circumstances. I like Guinness for those of you who want to have a beer somewhere. I prefer my chicken wings really hot and a little crispy."

Today, Operation Rescue scrambles to clarify that Terry left the organization years ago, and is no longer authorized to speak for them. They note that Tiller's assassin was never an official member of Operation Rescue, and that they condemn murder.

For years, though, they have been happy to explain why Tiller was a mass murderer, a man who had to be be stopped at all costs. An evil, inhuman monster. That's still a common theme in the press releases issued by groups like the American Life League (one of the organizations I worked with when I was younger). Tiller's killing was wrong of course, but...

I remember being there.

I remember being the person whose first concern at the news of a clinic bombing was, "This will hurt our cause."

And I remember thinking--saying to friends--that while I understood murder was wrong, wouldn't killing an abortionist be defending someone from a killer?

I remember the thoughtful consideration the question received. "Well... yes, but..."

It's been a long time since I felt as sick as I do tonight.

I'm sorry, Jeff.

The universal temptation of violence hurts more than its obvious victims.

It may sound weird, but this

It may sound weird, but this post did a lot to add a face and humanize the pro-life movement for me. I appreciate you sharing it.

Thanks.

It wasn't actually my intention when I started writing. I'm not really sure what my intention was, other than talking through my own feelings and reflections on the issue.

Perhaps in part I wish to say, "I'm sorry" to a man who's dead. Deeply, profoundly sorry that I participated in his demonization.

There is an issue with the

There is an issue with the murder of George Tiller, even especially if you're a Christian who finds abortion to be a loathsome practice: the fundamental tenet of Christianity is grace. As in the absolution of pre-defined consequence for action, a sort of exception for the Scriptural third law of motion.

Proceeding with the belief matrix of a Christian, let's assume George was not Christian. His killer robbed him of the opportunity for salvation, damning him eternally. And that's a pretty big problem because Christ's mission was to provide a way absolution of sin for everyone. Especially for George Tiller. And the guy that pulled that trigger screwed him out of any opportunity for absolution.

I don't know how anyone who would claim to be Christian could be anything but pissed/saddened/disgusted over this murder.

This story hits home

This story hit home so hard that I feel I'd written every word of it myself. Srsly, thanks for posting this. Amazing linear contradictions of belief stranded with the will to survive at all costs.

Astounding, saddening, and deeply moving, to be sure.

Horrifed By Both Sides

It is possible to stand on both sides. First, without exception, Tiller's murder was wrong, no matter which side you are on in the abortion debate.

But, at the same time, what took place inside of Tiller's clinic was absolutely horrific. He was willing to terminate pregnancies well past the fetus' viability, and there is absolutely no proof that at any time it was necessary for the health of the mother. Here's a description of what is involved in the partial birth abortion procedures he did:

the physician grasps the fetus's lower extremity with fingers or forceps and pulls the fetus through the cervix and vagina until its head is lodged in the cervical opening. At this point, the fetus's arms and legs have been delivered outside the uterus while the fetus is still alive. With the fetus's head lodged in the cervix, the physician punctures the skull with scissors or crushes the head with forceps.... The physician then drains the fetus's skull by suction, or by using a finger, and the skull collapses.

How can you read that and not be sick to your stomach? Yet everybody sort of wants to gloss over that inconvenient truth when talking about Tiller

By reading your post, it sounds like you were pulled from the anti-abortion movement more by the rhetoric of those against abortion than by the issue itself. I'm sure there's more to it, but that's what it sounds like. It's also unfortunate that it happened, because defending the helpless unborn is one of the most important things we can do.

So what I'm trying to say is that it is possible to be horrified and saddened by Tiller's murder without reservation, but to be equally horrified at what happened in that clinic and be somewhat relieved that the unborn in Kansas can breathe a little easier now.

The reasons my views have

The reasons my views have changed are my own. The rhetoric of the activist side of the pro-life community is not responsible for the evolution of my beliefs.

It is possible to be horrified and saddened by Tiller's murder without reservation, but to be... somewhat relieved that the unborn in Kansas can breathe a little easier now.

That statement is, in a nutshell, what my post is all about.

More than can be explained here


The reasons my views have changed are my own. The rhetoric of the activist side of the pro-life community is not responsible for the evolution of my beliefs.

Like I said, I'm sure there was more to it than could be explained in one blog post. Thanks for sharing what you did, though. It was interesting to read your thoughts.

Anyone who is unable to simply say that murder is wrong

Anyone who is unable to simply say that murder is wrong, full stop, need to learn to just shut up on occasion. Sometimes it isn't about you.
Never mind the lies you spread about the life saving services Dr. Tiller provided, if you can't at the very least lay off the vilification in the face of a man's murder, maybe you just shouldn't say anything at all.

I feel sorry for you.

To suffer confusion about some basics like obeying the law of this precious land, to say nothing of the law of God (Thou shalt not kill) even when you do not agree with the law makes you and all other sympathizers to those that kill, maim and destroy, criminals. Dr. Tiller operated under the law whether you like it or not, so I consider his murder the work of an immoral vigilante. You SHOULD be sad for the work of truly good people like Gandhi, Jesus and MLK, Jr. never used violence to achieve their ends. That you couldn't tell the difference between right and wrong is sad indeed.

But the saddest thing is that your compatriots in "the movement" of pro-life killing do not see the light, so I guess I should be grateful that you have seen a glimmer.

Nobody likes abortion. But to mindlessly simplify the many, many factors that involve the personal lives of other people (i.e. none of YOUR business) in the throes of their own difficulties is wrong. Walk in womens' shoes before you even begin to judge. You have NO idea how complex such situations can be, and you are not qualified to judge anyway. Roe vs Wade already did that.

It is profoundly sad and

It is profoundly sad and ironic realizing that the deafening rhetoric on both sides has prevented discussion of important common ground, and that is preventing unwanted pregnancy.

As a parent, I have tried to raise my daughter and son to understand the value of placing their faith in God. I have told them I understand they will fail from time to time, just like I did. Just like we all do. Which is why God's Grace is amazing.

I hope my children believe me when I repeatedly have told them that there are no "unwanted pregnancies" in my family and that their children are welcome, regardless of circumstance, and that I will be there to help.

For those who identify with the "Pro-Life" and "conservative Christian" labels, ask yourself, would your children find it easier to have an abortion than to come to you and admit they had sex outside of marriage and now are pregnant?

If you are beating drums and carrying signs, make no mistake, you are distancing yourself from your children on this issue and "being afraid to come to you" could very *easily* become a reason your own children make this choice.

There are no pro-Abortionists. We are all in favor of life. Those who see Roe vs Wade as *the* issue are hereby thanked for 36 years of polarizing service and relieved from further duty. It's time to get something done.

Thank you, Jeff, for this post.

Thank you.

I really appreciate your comment, Amy. The kind of compassion and connection to one's own family that you describe is important; a friend of mine lived in the shadow of Oral Roberts University a number of years ago, and it was common knowledge in the medical community there that students from the school formed a quiet, steady stream to the local Planned Parenthood clinic. There was no conceivable option for them that didn't involve the destruction of life as they knew it; and so the cycle continued.

One of the things that still sobers me is the characterization of Tiller that I had accepted, uncritically, for so long. A 'profiteer' and so on. A passage from one of today's articles captures the unexpected, heartbreaking detail that has no place in tidy, easy Us-And-Them battles.

Tiller never set out to become an abortion provider, or even an ob/gyn. The son of a doctor, Tiller was working as a Navy surgeon when his father, mother, sister, and brother-in-law were killed in a plane crash. He took over his father's family practice, and soon women started asking him if he was going to do what his father did. That's how he found out his father had provided abortions in the years before Roe v. Wade. He committed himself to providing the same service.

Even if one believes that what he did was terrible, we are left with the uncomfortable truth that he was more complex, and far less vaudevillian, than the caricature of him that was offered for so many years. A profiteer in the medical world can find much easier and less dangerous paths to riches.

Frank Schaeffer, son of Evangelical theologian and Pro-life movement icon Francis Schaeffer, gave a sorrowful interview today reflecting on many of the same issues in this post.

...Even if the murderer never read Dad's or my words, we helped create the climate that made this murder likely to happen.

Tiller provided valuable medical services

Tiller provided valuable medical services to women and girls who had horrible choices. An 11 year girl who was raped. A woman diagnosed with leukemia and in need of life saving chemotherapy that would have killed the fetus. We need to reduce abortions thru better education and choices, not by demonizing healthcare providers.

Complexity

Ironically, late term abortions are the least likely to be elective. this episode of Here and Now includes an interview with a woman from Virginia who received a legal later term abortion from Keller. Due to complications with her wanted pregnancy, the child would have been born with non-functioning lungs and no heart. In the worst case, the child's in-utero death would have resulted in her sterility.

Kleiman begins the interview by explaining, "Thanks to Dr. Tiller, I was able to have two healthy children."

Steve, some corrections and more info

Steve - it may make it easier for you to think more compassionately about Tiller when you realize that the myths about his practice are untrue. The abortions he performed were not done with the method you describe in your quote. The women he served had babies who were dying, or certain to die after enduring short lives of surgery, hospitalization, and pain. If you would like to learn about what kind of woman made these choices, and why this doctor felt his services were so necessary and were truly the morally right thing to do, I recommend you read some of these Kansas Stories, in which women relate the tragic events that brought them to Tiller's clinic, and what happened there - and also grieve and memorialize their losses.

This.

Thanks for writing it.

I tried a couple of times to write something a bit longer and more verbally appreciative, but: this. Thank you.

Pingback

[...] Eaton, moral courage, Obsidian Wings, pro-life, pro-lifers, Renaissance Guy, Slacktivist A former pro-lifer who has moral courage: a current pro-lifer without [...]

Your post is a great summary

Your post is a great summary of why there is no half-way with being pro-life, or being a Christian.

If you believe life is sacred you can't make exceptions. And there should never be any shame in being pregnant. It's not an action, it's a result.

And if you believe Jesus came to save sinners, you should fight with everything in your being to insure that those who do what you hate most can spend as much time as they can learning about God. Even if they are Hitler. Jesus spent a lot of time with people who were not doing what he wanted them to.

Thanks for sharing that. I

Thanks for sharing that. I didn't realize your extent of past involvement in the pro-life movement.

My hope is that we keep forging ahead toward adequate sex eduacation and easier access to birth control, that these can become realistic occurances in order to prevent unwanted pregnancies. I'm still appalled at the attitudes of some schools and communities that shun the idea of talking about sex when their teenage pregnancy rates are someof the highest in the nation. Maybe then we can finally get more serious about outlawing abortion.

George

I actually knew George for many years, and I can tell you that he was NOT a Hitler. He truly believed in his heart that what he was doing was for the good of his patients.

Your blog post is very much appreciated. It brings things into perspective. It is easy to put a face of evil on people/things of whom/which we, in reality, know very little about.

Thanks Jeff

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote> <img> <i> <b> <strike> <h3> <h4>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may use [inline:xx] tags to display uploaded files or images inline.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Twitter-style @usersnames are linked to their Twitter account pages.
  • Twitter-style #hashtags are linked to search.twitter.com.

More information about formatting options

Miniblog

  • The lie is A LIE 46 min ago
  • Ev's keynote feels like Twitter: three minutes in, there's cool news, a phone glitch, and the mic failed. #sxsw 11 hours ago
  • Hot rumor: O'Reilly is saving the panda bear for "chatroulette: the definitive guide." 1 day ago
  • Only you can prevent hipster fires 2 days ago
  • On a bed with@jjeff in a fireball shooting rv with 20 people singing karaoke "tiny dancer" - would not have predicted this 2 days ago

SXSW Interactive 2010!

Come to the 2010 CMS Expo